An exploding craft beer industry has led to an uptick in lawsuits about beer names and labels. Craft beer lovers do not always appreciate the lawsuits. But what do the federal courts think about them?
This morning, we awoke to the news that the U.K. has voted to exit the European Union. Our first thought was whether this vote, and the expected unwinding of the U.K. from the European legal system, will have any impact on our clients’ European intellectual property rights in the U.K.
With President Obama’s signing of the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) on May 11, 2016, federal intellectual property law has expanded to include trade secrets, which had previously been governed exclusively by state law. Although the text of the DTSA is largely consistent with the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), the law which 48 states have adopted in some form to protect trade secrets, this new law contains several features which will provide expanded protection to trade secret owners.
So apparently, Netflix is good for something other than just House of Cards. In an eagerly-awaiting ruling Wednesday, the SEC issued a report confirming that companies are permitted to disseminate material information through their social media channels in compliance with Regulation Fair Disclosure (“Regulation FD”) so long as investors know that companies are going to do so.
Today in Singapore, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) voted to allow registrations of brand-specific generic top level domains, or gTLDs as they’re known. No more will internet addresses be limited to the familiar “.com” and “.net” suffixes.
I guess we should have seen this coming – or not. As reported by CNN on Tuesday, Apple has obtained a federal trademark registration for its slogan, THERE’S AN APP FOR THAT. Well, ok…CNN got it wrong; the PTO has only just accepted Apple’s Statement of Use, which means that a registration is imminent, but we’ll let CNN slide on this one.
This post is an update to our August 27th post where we reported that a District Court in California held that privacy settings on Facebook and MySpace do actually matter.
Interbrand has just released its annual listing of the Top 100 Global Brands.
Another day, another case of a company not bothering to see how its new trademark translates into the native languages of its intended consumers.
On May 26th, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that, under the Stored Communications Act of 1986, postings to a user’s Facebook “wall” (and, similarly, to the “comments” page on MySpace – although nobody actually uses MySpace anymore) are considered private so long as the user has his privacy settings set such that only “friends” can see his wall postings.
- Craft Brewing
- Defend Trade Secrets Act
- Uniform Trade Secrets Act
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Securities Law
- Securities Regulation
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Social Media
- Credit CARD Act
- Intellectual Property
- Trademarks And Craft Brewing: What Do Federal Courts Think Of Craft Beer Lovers?
- UK Votes to Brexit -- Keep Calm and Carry On
- DTSA Expands Protection to Trade Secret Owners
- SEC Sides with Netflix – Social Media Channels Comply with Regulation FD
- ICANN Approves New gTLDs, Kicks Off Global Money-Grab
- There's An App For That - But Only From Apple...?
- Update: Social Network Privacy Settings Still Mean Nothing in New York
- Interbrand's Top 100 Global Brands for 2010 Released
- Bad Brand Decision from Audi "Rears" Its Ugly Head?
- Court Rules on Social Media Sites' Privacy Settings