ADVERTISING MATERIAL
Print Bookmark

Trademark Registration Practice is Officially…umm…Well, You’ll See

In perhaps the least surprising trademark decision of the past 12 months, and one that could have been rendered in under 5 pages (rather than the 50 it actually took), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit last Friday held that the Lanham Act’s Section 2(a) bar on registration of marks which “consist of or comprises immoral…or scandalous matter” is an unconstitutional, content-based restriction on speech. In re Brunetti, Appeal No. 2015-1109 (Fed. Cir. December 15, 2017). In that case, Erik Brunetti had toiled for more than 6 years attempting to register his mark, FUCT, for clothing. Those efforts were uniformly unsuccessful despite some weakly-creative arguments that the word, “fuct,” was not actually vulgar, and even if it was, Section 2(a) did not bar registration of “vulgar” marks.

Read more ...

TAGS: Intellectual Property, Trademark, United States Patent and Trademark Office

Why Is The USPTO Treating Marijuana Differently For Patents Than For Trademarks?

Although about half of the states have legalized medical marijuana, and the department of justice has declared it to be a low enforcement priority, marijuana is still a controlled substance under federal law, with criminal penalties for possession and sale.

Read more ...

TAGS: Medical Marijuana, Trademark, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, United States Patent and Trademark Office